NOTE: Results are NOT available by telephone or fax.
Examinees are provided with failing scores only and will also receive feedback regarding their performance on the exam in preparation for re-testing.
Passing scores are not provided as the Certifying Board has determined “Pass” is sufficient to designate successful completion of the exam.
Knowledge Exam – 100 points total
2019 – 69 points (exams KJ & ZP) 68 points (exam MG)
2020 – 69 points (exams KJ & ZP) 68 points (exam MG)
2021 – 68 points (exams LS & QI)
Skills Exam – 30 points total
- February – 19 points
- April – 19 points
- July – 18 points
- October – 20 points
- February – 20 points
- April – 18 points
- July – 18 points
- October – 21 points
How Passing Score is Established
The passing points, or cut scores, for the exams are established using a criterion-referenced technique. Qualified and trained SMEs participate in determining the passing points working with the psychometric consultant. The final passing points resulting from this process are approved by the Certifying Board (or SME working group).
Exam Score Appeal Process
An examinee may appeal, in writing, to the Certifying Board for review of the Board’s actions concerning examination results.
Such appeal must include the candidate’s basis for the appeal and any and all relevant documentation to be considered and must be received at NALA within thirty (30) days after release of the examination results. The Board Chair and NALA staff will promptly investigate to determine whether the documentation submitted meets the Certifying Board’s requirements for review of examination results. If it is determined that the appeal does not meet the requirements, the examinee will be so advised. If the information meets the Board’s requirements for an appeal, such appeal shall be reviewed by an appeal committee which shall be composed of a minimum of three (3) members of the Certifying Board, to include a paralegal educator, an attorney, and an Advanced Certified Paralegal. Each member of the Appeal Committee shall have served a minimum of one (1) year on the Certifying Board.
The Appeal Committee of the Certifying Board will determine whether a decision made by the Certifying Board was inappropriate if: (1) the decision was based on material errors of fact, or (2) the NALA Certifying Board failed to follow published criteria, policies, and procedures.
Only facts and conditions up to and including the time of the Certifying Board’s decision are eligible for consideration during the appeal process.
After consideration of the matter under appeal, the Appeal Committee shall submit its recommendation for action to the Certifying Board. A majority vote of Certifying Board members shall be final and binding in the matter under appellate review.